The Acute Effects of Cluster Set during Complex Training on Countermovement Jump
Asmadi Ishak1, Ali Md Nadzalan2, Thariq Khan Azizuddin Khan3, Zulezwan Ab Malik4, Yusri Yakub5, Hishamuddin Ahmad6, Hairul Anuar Hashim7
1Asmadi Ishak, Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
2Ali Md Nadzalan, Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
3Thariq Khan Azizuddin Khan, Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
4Zulezwan Ab Malik, Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia..
5Yusri Yakub, Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
6Hishamuddin Ahmad, Faculty of Sports Science and Coaching, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.
7Hairul Anuar Hashim, School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.
Manuscript received on November 19, 2019. | Revised Manuscript received on 27 November, 2019. | Manuscript published on December 10, 2019. | PP: 3481-3484 | Volume-9 Issue-2, December 2019. | Retrieval Number: B6538129219/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B6538.129219
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: This study aims to determine the acute effects of complex training with a cluster set configuration on countermovement jump. A crossover counterbalance design was used in this study. Fourteen recreational male underwent three sessions of trainings, with a minimum of 72 hours between each session. In the complex training (CT) protocol, squats with 65% 1RM were used for resistance training while jump squats with 80% of maximum effort for plyometric. Subjects performed the resistance and plyometric training alternately, using either traditional (TRA) or cluster with two sets (CS2). In TRA, no rest was given between the repetitions until they completed the entire set. For CS2, the pairs of CT 30s rest were inserted between the repetitions. The results of the study showed no significant interaction between TRA and CS2 across the all parameters: CMJ height (p> 0.05), power (p>0.050, and velocity (p>0.05) respectively. This study shows that both TRA and CS2 provide better CMJ height, power and velocity during CT. In conclusion, both TRA and CS2 can be adopted in training to enhance power.
Keywords: Recovery, Cluster set, Inter-repetitions rest, Velocity, Countermovement jump
Scope of the Article: Cloud, Cluster, Grid and P2P Computing