<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_batch version="4.4.2" xmlns="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.2" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:jats="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/JATS1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.crossref.org/schema/4.4.2 http://www.crossref.org/schema/deposit/crossref4.4.2.xsd">
<head>
<doi_batch_id>3d8d13581898e639443-567e</doi_batch_id>
<timestamp>20230825084350432</timestamp>
<depositor>
  <depositor_name>beie:beie</depositor_name> 
  <email_address>director@blueeyesintelligence.org</email_address>
</depositor>
<registrant>WEB-FORM</registrant> 
</head>
<body>
<journal>
<journal_metadata>   <full_title>International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering</full_title>   <abbrev_title>IJITEE</abbrev_title>   <issn media_type='electronic'>22783075</issn>   <doi_data>     <doi>10.35940/ijitee</doi>     <resource>https://www.ijitee.org/</resource>   </doi_data> </journal_metadata> <journal_issue>  <publication_date media_type='online'>     <month>08</month>     <day>30</day>     <year>2023</year>   </publication_date>   <journal_volume>     <volume>12</volume>   </journal_volume>   <issue>9</issue> </journal_issue><!-- ============== --> <journal_article publication_type='full_text'>   <titles>     <title>Assessing the Life Cycle Performance in the Metallurgical Sector: A Case Study in Italy</title>   </titles>   <contributors>      <organization sequence='first' contributor_role='author'>Department of Management, Sapienza University of (Rome), Italy.</organization>    <person_name sequence='first' contributor_role='author'>      <given_name>Giuliana</given_name>      <surname>Vinci</surname>      <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-1831</ORCID>    </person_name>    <person_name sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'>       <given_name>Marco</given_name>       <surname>Ruggeri</surname>       <ORCID>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6591-0142</ORCID>     </person_name>     <organization sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'>Department of Management, Sapienza University of (Rome), Italy.</organization>     <person_name sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'>       <given_name>Carlo</given_name>       <surname>Barricella</surname>     </person_name>     <organization sequence='additional' contributor_role='author'>Department of Management, Sapienza University of (Rome), Italy.</organization>   </contributors>    <jats:abstract xml:lang='en'>         <jats:p>This study compared two types of sheets: one made of steel and one made of aluminum, using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). The LCA results show that the aluminum sheet had a greater environmental impact than the steel one in 11 out of 18 impact categories, such as a 5% higher Global Warming Potential, 3% higher Stratospheric Ozone Depletion, and 72% higher Ionizing Radiation. The main contributing factors were energy-intensive processes and bauxite processing associated with aluminum production. The LCC results also supported the findings of the LCA, demonstrating that the raw material, electricity, and labor costs for aluminum sheets were higher compared to steel ones, with the aluminum sheets costing €163 and the steel ones costing €19. However, the S-LCA results presented a contrasting perspective. They indicated that steel sheets exhibited poorer social performance compared to aluminum ones, particularly regarding child labor and discrimination, primarily due to the harsh working conditions in Ghana, the primary source of iron used in steel production. Overall, this study highlights the environmental superiority of steel screens over aluminum ones but also underscores the social challenges associated with steel production.</jats:p>     </jats:abstract>  <publication_date media_type='online'>     <month>08</month>     <day>30</day>     <year>2023</year>   </publication_date>   <pages>     <first_page>22</first_page>     <last_page>27</last_page>   </pages>   <crossmark>     <crossmark_version>CC BY-NC-ND 4.0</crossmark_version>     <crossmark_policy>10.35940/BEIESP.CrossMarkPolicy</crossmark_policy>     <crossmark_domains>       <crossmark_domain>          <domain>www.ijitee.org</domain>       </crossmark_domain>     </crossmark_domains>     <crossmark_domain_exclusive>true</crossmark_domain_exclusive>     <custom_metadata>       <assertion explanation='Journal Name' group_label='Journal Name' group_name='Journal' name='Declaration' order='0'>International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE)</assertion>       <assertion explanation='Funding' group_label='Funding' group_name='Funding' name='Declaration' order='1'>No, we did not receive.</assertion>       <assertion explanation='Conflicts of Interest' group_label='Conflicts of Interest' group_name='Conflicts-of-Interest' name='Declaration' order='2'>No conflicts of interest to the best of our knowledge.</assertion>       <assertion explanation='Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate' group_label='Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate' group_name='Ethical-Approval-and-Consent-to-Participate' name='Declaration' order='3'>No, the article does not require ethical approval and consent to participate with evidence.</assertion>       <assertion explanation='Availability of Data and Material' group_label='Availability of Data and Material' group_name='Availability-of-Data-and-Material' name='Declaration' order='4'>Not relevant.</assertion>       <assertion explanation='Authors Contributions' group_label='Authors Contributions' group_name='Authors-Contributions' name='Declaration' order='5'>All authors have equal participation in this article.</assertion>     </custom_metadata>   </crossmark>   <doi_data>     <doi>10.35940/ijitee.I9702.0812923</doi>     <resource>https://www.ijitee.org/portfolio-item/I97020812923/</resource>   </doi_data> </journal_article>
</journal>
</body>
</doi_batch>
