An Exploration of Effective Evaluation Rubrics for Assessing the Writing Skill of Engineering Graduates
T. Anitha1, K. Brindha2

1T. Anitha, Department of Science and Humanities, Sri Krishna College of Engineering and Technology, An Autonomous Institution, Kuniamuthur, Coimbatore (Tamil Nadu), India.

2Dr. K. Brindha, Assistant Professor Head, Department of English, Chikkanna Government Arts College, Tirupur (Tamil Nadu), India.

Manuscript received on 27 November 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 15 December 2019 | Manuscript Published on 30 December 2019 | PP: 548-553 | Volume-9 Issue-2S3 December 2019 | Retrieval Number: B11291292S319/2019©BEIESP | DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.B1129.1292S319

Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open-access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (

Abstract: The work breaks down the measurements pursued during the evaluation. The educators are liable for leading the appraisal. Consequently, the technique decides the different measures for examining composing strategies. A typical issue isn’t finishing all parts of the assignment. Students should ensure they read the errand guidelines cautiously and find out precisely what they are required to do. The directions typically clarify that there are various explicit parts of the general assignment, all of which should be finished. To keep away from breakdowns in association and cognizance, it is prudent to compose a different section to manage every point. There ought to likewise be clear linkage between passages by alluding advances or in reverse in the content utilizing firm methods, for example, proper conjunctions, pronouns, redundancy or substitution of watchwords and expressions, and words, for example, ‘this’, ‘that’, ‘already’, ‘next’, and so on. Composing ought to be succinct and ought to exclude any superfluous or immaterial substance. Up-and-comers should ensure that they edit that they got done with composing cautiously to maintain a strategic distance from such syntactic blunders as poor sentence structure, off base subject action word understanding, conflicting or wrong utilization of particular and plural, poor word request, base tenses, erroneous utilization of grammatical forms (utilizing a modifier rather than an intensifier, or a thing rather than an action word, for instance) and inaccurate accentuation, just as spelling botches. Banalities, for example, ‘enlarging their points of view’s or ‘accepting brilliant open doors’ ought to be maintained a strategic distance from as they are now and again (mis)used and can prompt perplexity. Competitors are encouraged to invest more energy using English writings of the sort depicted in the Reading segment to build their jargon and to rehearse their composition. They ought to likewise be comfortable with the fundamental structure of a reasonable book. The review investigates the different measurements to be pursued when instructors right the test papers.

Keywords: Teachers, Students, Exam, Writing, Metrics.
Scope of the Article: Social Sciences