Model of Collective Bargaining for Productivity Improvement “A case study from indonesia manufactruring company”
Ruslan Irianto Simbolon1, Moch. Asmawi2, Ma’ruf Akbar3, James Tangkudung4

1Ruslan Irianto Simbolon, Doctorate Program, Department of Human Resource Management, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jalan Rawamangun Muka Jakarta, Indonesia.

2Moch. Asmawi, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia.

3Ma’ruf Akbar, Department of Educational, Technology Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia.

4James Tangkudung, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Indonesia.

Manuscript received on 10 April 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 17 April 2019 | Manuscript Published on 02 June 2019 | PP: 121-125 | Volume-8 Issue-6C2 April 2019 | Retrieval Number: F10240486C219/19©BEIESP

Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open-access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (

Abstract: He main purpose of this paper is to gain in-depth understanding about Collective Bargaining (CB) practices in Indonesia manufacturing company. The research is taken place in a largest automotive Manufacturing company in Indonesia that had succed improving its productivity and this study tries to build its model through its bargaining agreement practices. Beardwell, Holden & Claydon (2014) model is used as a theoretical framework in analyzing phenomena and then is developed in finding the social themes behind it. The study uses qualitative approach by adopting case study method that was suggested by Yin (2012). Data is collected by using observations, document analysis, and in-depth interviews conducted formally and informally by using snowball sampling techniques. Data are analyzed as it is suggested by Huberman & Miles (2009). The study found that reasons behind a proper CB policies and practices between union and management are both of parties: (a) stand for government regulation and follows the rules; (b) try to understand each other and hold commitment to cooperate as they have signed in Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and (c) denying political interest in conducting CB and focus only on company productivity. Further data analysis found out that these phenomena are grounded from its corporate business value about people and also company policy about its production system. The study shows that the key elements in practicing collective bargaining agreements that lead to productivity improvement is not determine how strong is the power, but lies upon how its corporate business values about its employees and what system the company adopt to produce its product.

Keywords: Collective Bargaining, Corporate Business Value, Production System, Productivity Improvement.
Scope of the Article: Cyber-Physical Systems