Evaluation for Improving Security Management of Service Oriented Architecture At Meraki Digital Indonesia
Indra Ranggadara, Faculty of Computer Science, Mercu Buana University, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Manuscript received on 28 June 2019 | Revised Manuscript received on 04 July 2019 | Manuscript published on 30 July 2019 | PP: 1191-1198| Volume-8 Issue-9, July 2019 | Retrieval Number: I8067078919/19©BEIESP| DOI: 10.35940/ijitee.I8067.078919
Open Access | Ethics and Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: Meraki Digital Indonesia wants to evaluate security management on Service Oriented Architecture that has been implemented in this company whether it is in accordance with the standards or not, using the COBIT 5 method. It is expected that the suitability of the maturity level can be carried out in accordance with the security management domain needed to ensure the fulfillment of the basic requirements of organizational information resources, namely the availability of integrity and availability of data or information. As well as using the Analytical Hierarchy Process algorithm to provide recommendations using decision-making in solving problems with explicit logical analysis, there are three principles that underlie AHP thinking, which is compiling hierarchies, the principle of setting priorities, and the principle of logical consistency. Then the evaluation results using COBIT 5, there are 6 security management criteria that are used as a basis for evaluating, among others, strategies & policies, organizations, people, processes, technology and facilities and domains that are used are Plan and Organizes (PO), Acquire and Implement (AI), Deliver and Support (DS), and Monitor and Evaluate (ME). Whereas for recommendations needed by using analytical hierarchy processes, there are three things that need to be improved according to the wishes of stakeholders, namely the need to improve the criteria of technology with a value of 0.132, facilities with a value of 0.137, and people with a value of 0.161 according to the lowest ranking on the tested criteria.
Keywords: Analytical Hierarchy Process, Cobit, Evaluation, Service Oriented Architecture, Security Management.
Scope of the Article: Performance Evaluation of Networks