Effect of Using Different Encoders in Bluetooth
Pankaj Garg1, Ruby Verma2
1Garg, M.Tech, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Lovely Professional University Phagwara (Punjab), India.
2Ruby Verma, M.Tech, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Lovely Professional University Phagwara (Punjab), India.
Manuscript received on 12 March 2013 | Revised Manuscript received on 21 March 2013 | Manuscript Published on 30 March 2013 | PP: 147-149 | Volume-2 Issue-4, March 2013 | Retrieval Number: D0560032413/13©BEIESP
Open Access | Editorial and Publishing Policies | Cite | Mendeley | Indexing and Abstracting
© The Authors. Blue Eyes Intelligence Engineering and Sciences Publication (BEIESP). This is an open access article under the CC-BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Abstract: IEEE 802.11 and Bluetooth are the two different wireless systems that share the same frequency band in 2.4 GHz and are likely to interfere with each other if operating in the same environment and thus experience a severe decrease in throughput. The devices equipped with IEEE 802.11 and Bluetooth are mobiles, laptops, watches and many more and in future with WiMAX. Result is the number of co-located devices may cause interference issues in the 2.4 GHz radio frequency spectrum. Like other communication devices Bluetooth also consists of transmitter, channel and receiver. In transmitter and receiver encoders and decoders are used. In Bluetooth transmitter different types of encoders are used like RS encoder, Hamming encoder, CVSD encoder etc. these encoders have its own advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, by using of two different encoders like hamming encoder and CVSD encoder we analyse the communication of Bluetooth device and compare the BER.
Keywords: CVSD, ISM, LMP, L2CAP, HCL, PCM and RFCOMM.
Scope of the Article: Frequency Selective Surface